USCG, EPA Preparing for ECAs Enforcement

November 19, 2014

The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will soon take action to ensure compliance with the forthcoming 0.10 percent fuel sulphur limits in the North American and U.S. Caribbean Sea Emmission Control Areas (ECAs), the USCG’s Maritime Commons said.

“We will be coordinated in our efforts to ensure compliance with the new requirements effective January 1, 2015,” said Rear Adm. Paul Thomas, assistant commandant for Prevention Policy at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters. “That includes working with EPA to actively check for compliance and taking appropriate enforcement action.”

According to Maritime Commons, the USCG will continue to check Bunker Delivery Notes and other records during Port State and Flag State visits to vessels, adding that the USCG and EPA are developing plans for joint boardings of vessels to include fuel oil sampling and in-the-field screening for sulphur levels.

“Working closely with our partners at the Coast Guard, we’re stepping up our compliance efforts and will take targeted enforcement actions when necessary,” said Cynthia Giles, assistant administrator for EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. “Making sure that everyone plays by the rules will help level the playing field for companies that comply, while reducing harmful air pollution in coastal and inland communities.”
 

Logistics News

Oil Supply to Outpace Demand in Medium-Term

Oil Supply to Outpace Demand in Medium-Term

Guinea Exports Record 48.6 Million Tons of Bauxite

Guinea Exports Record 48.6 Million Tons of Bauxite

ASRY Hosts First Innovation Forum with Lumofy

ASRY Hosts First Innovation Forum with Lumofy

Osbit Opens New Offshore Wind Facility in Port of Blyth

Osbit Opens New Offshore Wind Facility in Port of Blyth

Subscribe for Maritime Logistics Professional E‑News

Sydney flights affected by heavy rain, winds and flood alert
Analysts estimate that Ukraine's gas reserves are more than 8 billion cubic meters.
Is the escalating spat between Trump and Musk a regulatory threat to Musk's businesses?