28670 members and growing – the largest networking group in the maritime industry!


Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Maritime Logistics Professional

August 1, 2013

AIS & ARPA Role in Collision Avoidance: An Expert View

ECDIS Dislay with Decision Support Tools: Image courtesy of Totem Plus ECDIS

ECDIS Dislay with Decision Support Tools: Image courtesy of Totem Plus ECDIS

An article by Totem Plus ECDIS CEO Capt. Azriel Rahav, Ph.D. addresses the view held by some that AIS information should not be used for collision avoidance as the COLREGS do not make specific mention of it.

Since the introduction of AIS in 2001, the question of “how to use AIS data on board” remains unclear. The “International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at sea 1972 (COLREGS)" have no reference to AIS but only to Radar. Consequently, many mariners are under the impression that AIS information SHOULD NOT be used for collision avoidance.  This attitude is heard from many officers and Masters, possibly coming from wrong interpretation of the rules by some marine schools. In this article we will press the point that AIS information SHOULD be used for collision avoidance.

Naturally, a reader who is familiar with the COLREGS will counter the opposing reasoning above and will immediately quote rule 7(a), which says "Every vessel shall use all available means appropriate", and consequently AIS should be used if available.  But mariners are not supposed to be legal experts, and should not be in a position where interpretations should be applied.

In order to further understand this issue, one must go back to the original guidelines given by IMO on “Use of AIS in Collision Avoidance Situations”. These guidelines are part of IMO Resolution A.917 (22), adopted on 29 November 2001. Those guidelines, incidentally, are set to be revised by IMO in 2014.

Use of AIS

Reading the guidelines, the text is indeed self explanatory.  The guidelines state that “AIS is an additional source of navigational information”, and further that “AIS can assist in tracking it {a detected ship} as a target”.   Combining the above with the COLREGS requirement that the Officer Of the Watch (OOW) should use “all available means”,  is a clear indication that IMO intended the AIS to be used to avoid collision.

However, a word of caution should be included: the guidelines also warn that the mariner should not rely on AIS alone, and should not use the AIS as an excuse to slacken his lookout or responsibility. This statement agrees fully with COLREGS requirements for good seamanship and proper look-out. 

Possibly the reader should also be aware that, in interpreting AIS data by ECDIS systems, the good practice is  to use the target positions only and not trust the SOG (Speed Over Ground) and COG  (Course Over Ground) computed and sent by the target’s AIS transmitter.  Those parameters are calculated separately using the Kalman algorithm, as is customary with ARPA systems.

Totem ECDIS Decision Support Tools & AIS
Decision making is precisely the process where Totem ECDIS provides unique Decision Support Tools. Such tools give the OOW the suggested course of action, either the exact course change or the exact speed change that is advised in order to avoid collision.  With Decision Support Tools, the Decision Making process becomes more methodical and the right decision is more often taken.  

The author states that his company is complying with all the above IMO guidelines, in particular with items   40.1, 41 and 43, and that their system is fully compatible with the COLREGS, emphasizing that, in complying with IMO guidelines, the decision support tools are based on both AIS and ARPA information.

Captain Rahav concludes that Decision Support Tools are already used for other aspects of navigation, notably for Grounding Avoidance and Route Planning.  The adoption of Collision Avoidance tools as offered by his company is seen by him as a natural step forward. 


United Nationsdecision support tools