28620 members and growing – the largest networking group in the maritime industry!

LoginJoin

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Maritime Logistics Professional

August 5, 2013

Arctic Oil & Gas - "Alaska 1, Norway 0"

 E&P costs have been increasing by 11% per annum for the last five years, according to Barclays Capital, and nowhere are they increasing faster than in remote and harsh offshore environments like Alaska’s OCS or Norway’s north Barents Sea.

The governments of Alaska and Norway have taken diametrically opposite courses. Alaska decreased its marginal tax on oil production from 85% to 35%, and BP promptly moved to add two new rigs to its Prudhoe Bay operations. By contrast, the Norwegian government has raised taxes on its oil industry, prompting Statoil to defer the Johan Castberg north Barents Sea project.

Although the Brent oil price has shown signs of life in recent days, we believe that exploration and production costs will continue to outpace oil price gains, just as they have for the last two years. Therefore, industry economics will remain under pressure. And if the costs of oil extraction are increasing, then governments sooner or later will have to appreciate that the value of reserves in the ground is falling. Far from being able to grow government take (including taxes, royalties and production sharing), the oil companies will increasingly be requiring direct or indirect tax cuts if production--and oil field services employment--is to be maintained.

Back in the Arctic, the State of Alaska seems to be catching on; Norway, less so. For now, Alaska 1, Norway 0.
 

 

StatoilAlaskaNorway