Piracy may affect seafaring career

Apr 12, 2010, 10:30AM EST
Seafarers left to handle pirates on their own

All efforts to eliminate piracy have failed to yield pragmatic results. The observations by International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) on Piracy is that the “on going piracy and armed robbery attacks have been on the increase and are becoming more violent and audacious”. This was conveyed by Jim Mainstone, Head of Intelligence and Risk, Gray Page, U.K during his visit to Mumbai on 7th April, 2010 to hold discussions with representatives of the Indian shipping industry, manning companies and the seafarers’ union.
 
Earlier the Seafarers’ International Union of North America (SIU), Nautilus International, All Japan Seamen’s Union and the National Union of Seafarers of India have been contemplating on a joint action to boycott vessels traversing pirate infested areas. But good sense prevailed and according to sources it was felt that cutting the nose to spite the face was not the right approach because pirates in their desperation could cast their nets far and wide and instead of containment, the virus could propagate worldwide.
                                                     
Whenever the issue of piracy is discussed it has become customary to point out the failure of many countries to ratify the IMO’s 1988 Convention for Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the safety of Navigation being the reason which often prevents criminals from being brought to justice. As a result piracy and armed robbery has become the scourge of today’shipping industry.
 
Unfortunately the buck has stopped with the seafarers. According to Mr Mainstone the ship staffs have been advised to employ Best Management Practices (BMP) to avoid and deter piracy attacks or delay successful attacks in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia.
 
Seafarers are directed to be in constant contact with UKMTO Dubai, use additional private security guards (though not recommended,) enhance watch-keeping, use of thermal imagers during the night, erect physical defences onboard such as mesh fencing to prevent pirates from hooking their ladders and other special devices.
 
In the event of pirate trying to board the ship the crew is recommended to use hand-held dazzle devices, turning on water jets, manoeuvre the ship on a zigzag course, and if the attack is imminent the non-essential crew to move to a refuge – strong room.      
 
Speaking on the sidelines of a seminar on manning this morning Capt Boudewijn Baert, Marine Director of Exmar stated, “We had an occasion to use armed guards on our gas tankers while navigating the piracy infected area. But this was at the behest of the ship owner. However, we would not recommend using guards. If there is an exchange of fire there is all likelihood of the cargo exploding. But this problem of piracy is not likely to end soon. Yes if the seafarers have to make frequent trips through piracy areas we fear they will soon refuse sailing on such ships and it may deter persons taking seafaring as a career. ”
 
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
John Bennett
Regarding "additional private security guards (though not recommended)" one has to ask "not recommended by whom?" For US-flag vessels transiting the GoA or near the HoA, they are required by the US Coast Guard (although it is not required that they be armed). Regarding Captain Baert's statement concerning the effects of a possible exchange of fire, the pirates are already shooting at tankers. A trained security team is unlikely to shoot its own ship by mistake. And the admittedly limited experience with armed guards so far indicates that pirates on the receiving end of gunfire veer off in search of softer targets, rather than intensifying the engagement.
4/22/2010 2:14:14 PM
 
Joseph Fonseca
Thanks for your comments John. I agree there has to be some drastic measures to tackle piracy. When I had interviewed the then IMO Secretary-General emeritus, Mr. William A. O'Neil way back in 2003 he stated that IMO was of the view that if we arm people on board then someone is likely to get hurt. Even now this matter seems to be left to the ship owner and nothing mandatory has been prescribed.
4/24/2010 3:47:14 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

Post archive

April 2010(1)