The ILWU and Panama pilots tie-up might not have the pulling power

Sep 23, 2011, 6:43PM EST
The ILWU and Panama pilots tie-up might not have the pulling power
The Panama pilots have most to lose from any militancy

The Panama Canal's Alberto Aleman Zubieta is doing the rounds of the maritime equivalent of the TV talk shows – annual conferences and conventions. Most recently he was at the South Carolina trade conference, where the audience pondered deeply over his declaration that Charleston must get a move on and deepen the main channel to 50 feet.

"It's going to happen and everything points that it will happen so maybe you will have to do something sooner rather than later," he said of the 2014 opening date of the wider canal and the likelihood that Charleston will take 10 years to deepen the harbor. "It makes it essential that actually you need to do some improvements because we're going to be ready."  (Surprisingly, not everyone in Charleston – a fixture of US port and maritime history -- realizes that 50 feet is the new normal for post-Panamax and many of the cities august citizens oppose a deeper harbor, which is expected to cost $350 million at a minimum.)

In all probability, Mr. Zubieta will make the same remarks to other ports when he speaks at their events, so too much should not be read into his call for Charleston to hurry up.

Instead, more thought should be given to the alliance between the canal's pilots and the ILWU dockworkers' union on the West Coast. A University of California, Berkeley professor who specializes in labor issues terms this a "wow moment."

Others are not so sure, following the mayhem at Pacific Northwest ports over the employment of another union at a grain terminal. The statement put out by the canal pilots was less than firebrand and some observers see it as an indication that militancy is outside their job description.

"They see it as a symbolic alliance," says one San Francisco labor watcher. "If the riots in the Northwest had taken place a couple of weeks earlier, the pilots would have found a reason to delay their agreement. It is completely against their interests to think of going on strike at a time when the canal is going through a crucial phase. If Bob McEllrath counts on them going on strike in sympathy with their northern colleagues, he is going to find they will be full of excuses."

 

 

 

 
Filed under: Canal, ILWU, Panama, Zubieta
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...