TransPac assocation should prepare for a FMC assault

Nov 21, 2011, 3:06PM EST
TransPac assocation should prepare for a FMC assault
Always remember to follow bureaucrats' orders on details

Civil servants are renowned for being sticklers for details, even when these make no sense. If  Form XYZ on ballast volumes has to be filed in triplicate in Peoria every third Thursday in June, you had better make sure it's done, even though everyone has forgotten why.

Psychologists theorize that officials' brains are wired differently – which is why they join the civil service in the first place – but actual proof has still to be found. The only fact known is that details have to be followed.

Which is where the TransPacific Stabilization Agreement has blundered, and blundered badly, when it should have known better. Federal Maritime Commission boss Richard Lidinksy has called the association out for being late to file meeting minutes within 21 days.

"Near outright defiance" is how he terms the behavior of some members for filing 28 days later. Shocking indeed. Then he ladles it on, "… a group of shipping lines have been given antitrust immunity to collude to raise the rates that American shippers and consumers pay …", and the rest of it. (About 20 percent of minutes have been filed late.)

The point is, the FMC has obviously been building up ammunition to smear the TSA as much as possible.   But the 15-or-so members sail on, serene in the knowledge that they can't be touched. Now they are proposing to bring in a surcharge in January, hiking rates by $400 per 40-footer. " The recommended increases apply to all shipments moving under individual carrier tariffs, as well as service contract cargo in all commodity segments where volume commitments have been met and/or contract provisions permit."

Such a statement is likely to give Lidinsky, and the growing number of shippers who hate the TSA, apoplexy. This is seen as a declaration that the association can do what it likes and is paying lip service to the notion of individual and independent decision-making. Billing itself as " a research and discussion forum" is derided openly throughout the industry. The lines will mysteriously and simultaneously raise rates at the same time

The association could well wake up to a sudden federal shock next year. Keeping the FMC happy would be so much easier if members paid attention to the correct paper work.

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...