Protecting their pay since 2002

Jun 27, 2011, 1:09PM EST
The San Francisco pilots are losing their standing in the maritime community

Plaudits are apparently due to the San Francisco Bar Pilots for being so competent in stopping the CMA CGM box ship Norma from running aground. When the ship lost propulsion, the two pilots told the master what course to steer and made sure the tugs pulled in the right direction.

But wait. They were only doing the job that they're about to get paid more than $500,000 a year for, although that's not what they are saying to counteract the storm over their huge pay rise. They are linking the engine problem to the need for an increase.

In May, they introduced a new rule that ships over 1145 feet in length would need a second pilot. The Norma is longer than that but they refused to pilot it. California's Business, Transportation and Housing Agency had to order the pilots to do their job.

Just one more thing, as the late, great Lieutenant Columbo used to say. Why did they refuse to pilot the ship AFTER the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association advised member lines to pay only the rates in force now – rather than the proposed higher rate that would be effective from January (and which in any case has been stalled by the California authorities)?

On top of that, they have clouded the issue by using the defense that a premium was denied for the use of the second pilot on The Norma.

Their problem is that they have discarded professionalism for profit. Boss Bruce Horton should have agreed to bring in the ship without any grumbling, as part of the association's duties, and then complained that an agreement with CMA CGM had been broken. Instead, his attitude has laid bare the greed and self-interest that drives the association.

The pilots' motto is "Protecting the bay since 1850." Perhaps it should be "Protecting their pay since 2002." That was when they got their first big pay rise.

On a final note, while many news stories say that many of the 60 pilots are former commercial ship masters, they are actually former TUG BOAT captains.  

 
Filed under: CGM, CMA, Francisco, pilots, San
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
sam jebananthan
There are many places in the globe where vessels of certain LOA is manned by two pilots. I have a question reg the statement that all SF 60 Pilots are Tugboat captains and not Ex Masters of ocean going vessels: is this a valid statement?
Also that the fact that there is a pay issue does not necessarily mean asking for a second pilot on large vessels is wrong.
6/27/2011 3:23:24 PM
 
Charles Goodyear
Mr. Rushmere is dead wrong on the facts regarding this incident, and his tone makes you wonder who is really behind his inaccurate blog postings. I represent the San Francisco Bar Pilots and you can read the official statement regarding the Norma below from Captain Bruce Horton:

Statement from Captain Bruce Horton, San Francisco Bar Pilots, regarding the movements of the CMA CGM Norma:

We were approached many months ago and asked to consider moving ships that were initially considered too big to be safely piloted to the dock in Oakland. We undertook an extensive simulation project with the Port of Oakland, terminal operators, and shipping companies. It was determined that the ships could be moved safely, but only with two pilots and the use of some expensive precision positioning equipment.

We agreed to purchase the equipment, and a one-half pilotage rate would be charged for the second pilot.

Last week, our association expressed concern about moving the CMA CGM Norma, an 1145-foot cargo container, to the Port of Oakland. Our concern was caused by a directive issued by the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association (PMSA) which advised its members, the shipping companies for which we provide pilot services, that pilotage rates remain unchanged since 2006 and appeared to contradict the agreement reached with regards to extra pilotage needed for larger vessels.

In the case of the CMA CGM Norma, we had reached agreement with the company that owns the vessel months ago for the need to staff an additional pilot to move that vessel. After conferring with the Board of Pilot Commissioners, I made the decision at 1100 hours Thursday, June 16, to complete the vessel move with an additional pilot, whether or not the company agreed to ultimately pay for this important safety measure. My decision to complete this vessel move was communicated to the owners of the Norma and the Pilot Commission and it was made a day before we were in receipt of any communication or directive from the state Department of Business, Transportation & Housing.
The ship suffered an engine failure on its way into the Port of Oakland on Sunday, June 19. Fortunately, two of our pilot members onboard responded expertly to this emergency and were able to avert a disaster and dock the ship safely.

Yesterday, we again assigned two pilots to safely move the CMA CGM Norma out of San Francisco Bay. Whether we are paid or not for the time and expertise of our second pilot on this vessel move, we feel it is important to operate in the safest manner possible. It is regrettable that PMSA is seeking to politicize what is essentially a public safety decision.

Our association remains committed to providing the highest standard possible for maritime safety. While we want Northern California ports to remain competitive in the global shipping industry, we will continue to insist on any and all critical safety measures we feel are needed to move extra large vessels.
6/27/2011 4:17:47 PM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...