Los Angeles makes sure it looks pretty

Jun 10, 2011, 12:12AM EST
Latest budget forecasts $48 million increase in shipping income

Los Angeles port budgets need untangling for those fortunate not to be accountants or bookkeepers. The news media blithely trumpets the $976 million put out in the press release for the financial (fiscal) year beginning July, but this includes all funds available to the port, such as the TraPac and China Shipping accounts, along with interest earned from other sources.

Actual operating revenue for the year is forecast to be $405 million, up from $375 million in the previous year's budget. Shipping services are the main driver, bringing in $348 million ($320 million 2010/11). Wharfage is projected to earn $323 million, continuing its reign as the biggest single money maker. Second in the income stakes is land rentals at $47 million (up from $40 million this year). Pilotage will earn $7 million

Wages and salaries are predictably the biggest expense, taking up $110 million (an increase of about 1 percent) of total operating expenses of $225 million, a tad under 50 percent. Of this, $60 million is for salaries and $40 million for benefits (with other bits for incidental stuff).

Security takes another big slice at $24 million while "outside services" (e.g. contractors and suppliers) account for $36 million and city-provided services $40 million. Taxpayers might begin to wonder why so much has to be paid to the city when the port provides so much itself.

The big news from a financial guru's perspective is that what the port terms "net income" and which other people might call operating profit, is up more than 90 percent to $85 million.

Capital spending is taking up $230 million, with marine terminals taking up only 17 percent ($40 million).  TraPac will be the biggest terminal item at $11 million, while China Shipping gets $7 million.

It's a sign of the times that security is getting $24 million, more than any of the terminals. Another $30 million is being sunk into Main Channel deepening. Rail, road and bridge work is costing $40 million.

Just to round everything off with a nice pink ribbon, the port waterfront beauty project gets $45 million.  LA might have the slowest container movement rate of any of the world's major ports, but at least impatient cargo owners will have a nice view while they wait for their goods.

 
Filed under: Angeles, Los, ports, terminals
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...