Oakland's profitable port is predicted to stay healthy

Jul 14, 2011, 9:47PM EST
Oakland's profitable port is predicted to stay healthy
Unfortunately, the money is going to the aviation division

Oakland, California's third biggest container port and the fifth biggest in the country, expects operating income of $141 million in the 2011-2012 financial year, which is expected to rise to $153 million in 2013/14. Comparable operating income is forecast to be $17 million and $19 million respectively while full-time employees will rise slightly from 62 to 69.

Planners are taking no bets on ship calls, with the number staying at 2,088 over the next three years and loaded TEUs rising from 1.8 million to 1.9 million.

Capital expenditure planning is scoped out for a much longer period and will total $146 million at the end of 2015/16. Cold ironing will account for $85 million of this and the APL terminal $30 million.  

"For the first ten months of the 2010-2011, maritime revenues were approximately $9.7 million 6 percent higher than budgeted as a result of a 14 percent increase in container volume that moved through the Port in calendar year 2010", says the port.

The immediate fact that jumps out is how profitable the port is. Unfortunately, all that extra money is being sucked up by the much less profitable airport, which comes under the same administration and port commissioners.

Despite aviation earning less operating income than the maritime division, its operating expenses are more than four times as great, as is the number of employees. And for the period to 2015-2016 its capital spending is also four times as much.What this translates into is that total debt service will rise to $123 million in 2014 from $106 million this year. Finances should still be solid, with interest payments staying at 1.3 times covered.

Unlike its Southern California rivals, the port is coy about where the maritime division income is coming from. Predictably, the Middle Harbor brings in half the amount (expected to reach $77 million in 2014), but no breakdown is given.

One strategy is certain. Aviation is seen as the force of the future --- passenger fees are a gold mine and involve almost no effort. Maritime operations will be allowed to follow the path of least resistance and fend for themselves.

 

 
Filed under: budget, Oakland, ports
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...