Hopes for Upsetting the Transpacific Container Cart

Apr 01, 2010, 1:24AM EST
Customers reckon they are in for a better deal

Shipping line customers on the West Coast are crossing their fingers that the new service by start-up The Containership Company will last long enough to upset the established order on the Pacific route, which is rapidly assuming the guise of a dictatorship.
For a start, the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement (TSA) shows no sign of remorse or embarrassment at jacking up rates and is now legally allowed to discuss slow steaming. Its implied assertion that reduced speeds will mean customers benefiting from lower fuel surcharges has persuaded Federal Maritime Chairman Richard Lidinsky to endorse the extra role.
Cynics are already jeering, claiming that there is no sign of a new bunker fuel formula or of any details on how customers and shippers will benefit. If nothing transpires within the next three to six months, industry lobbies will be writing strong letters to Lidinsky, demanding that the new provision be yanked.
But an even more dictatorial trend has emerged. Shipping lines from China are said to be abandoning consignments on the docks if contract customers refuse to pay higher rates. More specifically, to avoid outrage from lines that are innocent of the charge, some lines that ship from China and have a large China shareholding are said to be indulging in this practice, which is little short of demanding a ransom.
The tales of woe are seeping through, with the exact circumstances still to be made clear. (Google's travails show just how hard it is to get the facts). But it is happening – while non-contract customers are being quoted spot rates that bear no relation to market economics.
This is where The Containership Company hopes to make inroads. Its dock-to-dock service gives a genuine, holdfast lower-than-market rate that should guarantee business.
There are no prizes for guessing that the model is being copied from airlines, with low charter rates being obtained on idle vessels, although there is some surprise in the industry that no-one has had the courage and initiative to put the idea into practice earlier.
Considerable international goodwill will accompany the first shipment, due at Los Angeles on May 3.
And, while I may be wrong, it does not appear that the line has declared its policy on slow steaming.
A yardstick of the line's "no frills" integrity and determination to be independent, will be shown by steering clear of the TSA. If the service proves a resounding success, steamship interests will be suggesting that TCC joins the TSA.
If that happens, Richard Lidinsky will be receiving a few more strongly worded letters. 
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Gary Ferrulli
The Containership Company, with one vessel a week with less than 3000 teu capacity, will make no difference in the TransPacific trades. First, they don't have the capacity to make any difference with only 5 ships and one ship a week service. Second, they will cater to NVOCC's likely taking up more than 50% of the capacity that they do have. Third, they will supply only port to port services - any and all inland acitivities will be for the cargo interests and most cargo interests have delegated the inland movements to the ocean carriers.
On the slow steaming, you have a good point that you should take up with the FMC IF you can't get a reasonable response from TSA. I would ask TSA, with their slow steaming providing so much cost savings, what actions are taking place to replace the Fuel Surcharge Formula or what impact has slow steaming had on the fuel consumption and thus the surcharge? If you don't get a reasonable respone within two weeks, go to the FMC with a formal complaint.
4/1/2010 12:05:11 PM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...