USCG Issues Interim Policy for STCW Compliance

Jan 03, 2012, 5:43PM EST
UPDATE, 1/4/12: The Notice of Policy has been published at 77 Federal Register page 232 and is also available online.

UPDATE, 1/4/12:  The Notice of Policy has been published at 77 Federal Register page 232 and is also available online.

 

The US Coast Guard has issued a Notice of Policy that is slated for publication in the Federal Register on January 4th.  The Notice deals with implementation of two aspects of the 2010 Manila Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW Convention) and the STCW Code, which entered into force on New Year’s Day.  The two aspects are changes to the hours of rest requirements and maritime security training and certification requirements for personnel working on vessels to which the STCW Convention applies.  Pending formal Federal Register publication, an advance copy of the Notice is available online.

Pending formal regulatory changes necessary for full implementation of the Manila Amendments by the US, the Notice offers guidance to owners/operators of US-flag vessels subject to the STCW Convention and Code.  ((The process for changing the regulations has been ongoing for years, including implementation of the 1995 STCW Amendments, most recently with the issuance of a Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—SNPRM—last August that dealt with far more than hours of rest and security training.)  While the Coast Guard will not enforce the new provisions on hours of rest until the new regulations are in place, it “encourages” US-flag vessels operating in foreign ports to implement the requirements and to document each crewmember’s hours of rest in the vessel’s logbook “to avoid any potential port state control detentions.”

As to implementing the maritime security training and certification requirements, the Coast Guard has adopted the approach of an IMO STCW Circular adopted last May that recommended that Port State Control authorities accept, at least until January 1, 2014, compliance with the training requirements of Section 13 of the International Ship and Port Facility (ISPS) Code as meeting the Manila Amendments, even though a mariner’s documentation might not comply with the latter.  Having determined that the requirements in 33 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 104.220 (maritime security training for vessel personnel with security duties) and 33 CFR 104.225 (maritime security training for all other personnel) meet the requirements of Section 13 of the ISPS Code, the Coast Guard will continue to enforce those provisions and recommends that US-flag vessels operating in foreign ports ensure that all personnel working aboard have their appropriate course completion certificates or company letters attesting to their compliance with 33 CFR 104.220 or 104.225.  The exception is the Vessel Security Officer (VSO), who must have a VSO endorsement on his or her Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC).

The Notice of Policy provides an interim means for the US to comply with the Manila Amendments while the Coast Guard pursues a formal rulemaking to its ultimate conclusion.

Tip of the Hat: To my good friend Dennis Bryant, from whose most excellent Bryant’s Maritime Blog I learned of a Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin announcing the forthcoming publication of the Notice of Policy.

NOTE: This post may be copied, distributed, and displayed and derivative works may be based on it, provided it is attributed to Maritime Transportation Security News and Views by John C. W. Bennett,http://mpsint.com

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/22/2012

Bob Condon
Joseph has hit the nail on the head, politics seem to overr...

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...