Leadlines

Oct 27, 2009, 7:00AM EST
Leadlines
Relegated to history

For hundreds, if not thousands, of years, mariners used leadlines to determine the depth of water. Knowing the depth would tell if the ship was or was not in danger of grounding. Many lead weights on the end the leadlines had a depression filled with wax or paraffin. When the lead struck the seafloor, some of the bottom material would become embedded in the wax or paraffin. When the leadline was raised, examination of the retained material could sometimes give the master additional information regarding the ship’s position, as charts often show the prevalent bottom composition in each area. Leadlines were considered a vital piece of equipment on the ship and the ship might be considered unseaworthy if it sailed without one. Merchant ships generally carried two types of leadlines: a deep sea leadline of about 100 fathoms length with the lead weighing 28 pounds or more and a hand leadline of about 25 fathoms length with the lead weighing 14 pounds or less. To avoid having to measure the length of line after each throw, it became traditional to tie marks at intervals along the line. The marks were made of different materials and had different shapes so that they could be easily recognized by appearance or feel. If the depth indicated by the leadline was at a mark, the leadsman would call out “by the mark” followed by the depth. If the depth was between two marks, the leadsman would call out “by the deep” followed by the estimated depth. Sometimes, particularly on the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers, leadsmen would use the word “twain” rather than “two” when reporting the depth. Thus, a depth of two fathoms might be called out as “by the mark twain”. The author Samuel Clemens, who worked as a river pilot in his youth, allegedly took his pen name from this practice. With the development of fathometers, use of the leadline gradually disappeared. It was not until 1996, though, that the US Coast Guard (not being a slave to fashion) finally amended its regulations to eliminate the requirement for carriage of leadlines by most US ships.  
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...