Rogue waves

May 28, 2010, 7:00AM EST
Rogue waves
Non-linear waves of extreme height capable of sinking large vessels

 Scientists for centuries scoffed at mariners who claimed to have encountered huge waves (80 feet or greater in height) at sea.  Conventional analysis showed that such wave heights could only be generated by a tsunami and then only as it approached shallow water.  The dispute was put to rest when, on January 1, 1995, a rogue wave struck the Draupner platform in the North Sea.  Instruments on the platform showed that the wave had a maximum height of 84 feet.  Scientists went back to their computers and developed new formulas conforming to known facts.  They now accept that these non-linear waves can and do form almost randomly at sea.  They are thought to occur due to the conjunction of two or more crossing or conflicting wave or current patterns.  There are a few areas, such as off the South African coast in the Agulhas current, where conditions tend to favor rogue wave formation.  A British oceanographic vessel operating in the North Atlantic in February 2001 measured a rogue wave with a height of 95 feet.  Now that scientists know what they are looking for, they have detected rogue waves by means of Earth-orbiting satellites used for routine sea surface measurements.  There is strong circumstantial evidence indicating that rogue waves sank the freighter MS München in 1978.  In 1942, the RMS Queen Mary, serving as a fast troopship in the North Atlantic, was struck broadside by a 92-foot high wave.  The ship listed briefly about 52 degrees before slowly recovering. In 1966, the cruise ship Michelangelo was struck by wave that broke heavy glass 80 feet above the waterline.  A hole was torn in the superstructure and three persons died.  In March 2010, the cruise ship Louis Majesty was transiting the Mediterranean Sea between Cartagena and Marseille when it was struck by three successive large waves.  Two passengers in a lounge were killed by flying glass when several of the windows shattered.  Many passengers were injured and the ship suffered extensive damage.  Scientists no longer dispute sailors who talk about rogue waves. 
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Keith Henderson
One thing that strikes me as being remarkable is that with all the traffic, convoys, warships etc in the Atlantic during the Second World War there is only one report, that of the RMS Queen Mary. Fortunately these freak waves seems to be a very rare occurrence!
5/29/2010 12:01:19 PM
 
Steve Butler
Large rogue waves formed by overlapping wave field reinforcement are temporary. Very large ones would be rare to start with, and would only last for a short time/distance and then fall apart into their component parts, so if you encountered one (and survived) and called another vessel a mile away with a warning ... he'd never see it.

One does wonder how many missing ships these things have killed.
5/30/2010 1:42:06 PM
 
Gunther Hoock
I crossed the Atlantic on the Muenchen in November of 1976 and knew quite a few of the crew who went down with her in the summer of '78. I can attest first hand to a few moments where it got very quiet on the bridge as we took green water over the entire bow. Having the house way up front doesn't help matters, of course. I presume the small accompanying picture is a photoshop?
6/3/2010 10:52:10 AM
 
Pavel Ivanov
My only wish is that we meet with rogue waves in articles and blogs, but not at sea :) I personally have not met with abnormal waves for my 17 years at sea, which thing i don't regret, but i've seen a cruise ship in a port of New Zealand several years ago. she was cruising south of NZ and encountered such a wave. bridge windows were smashed and the bridge was flooded. she had a black out. luckily the engines were re-started and vessel managed to make it to safe waters. to the joy of everyone nobody was seriously injured.
things happen, especially in extreme areas. i think passengers realizied what they paid for.
6/4/2010 10:27:16 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...