Coriolis effect

Jul 13, 2010, 7:00AM EST
Coriolis effect
 Curving movement to right in the northern hemisphere

 The Coriolis effect is the apparent deflection of a moving object when viewed from a rotating frame of reference.  An example is when two children on a merry-go-round try to throw a ball back and forth.  In flight, the ball appears to the children to follow a curved path.  Viewed externally, particularly from above, it is clear that the ball follows a straight path and it is the children who are on a curved path.  On the Earth, an object (such as an airplane) moving north from the equator curves eastward slightly (as viewed from the surface of the Earth).  Since we tend to locate everything using the surface of the Earth as a reference, we conclude that the airplane has curved to the right in its flight.  The same curved track is true for ships, but is inconsequential due to other, larger forces effecting the ship’s movement.  The mariner does feel the impact of the Coriolis effect in two other areas, though.  The movement of both air and water are subject to the Coriolis effect.  In the northern hemisphere, a wind from the south will gradually curve to the right (east).  Thus, air moving from an area of high pressure to an area of low pressure will curve away and eventually follow a line of equal pressure (isobar).  An illustration of this movement is the cyclone or hurricane, where the wind whirls around a low-pressure center in an endless loop.  Water currents behave in the same manner.  Large ocean currents in the northern hemisphere tend to adopt a clockwise movement.  In the southern hemisphere, the ocean currents tend to be counter-clockwise.  At the equator, the major currents flow toward the west, until diverted around large land masses.  The Coriolis effect is of no significance at small scales or low speeds.  Thus, the urban legend that water in a basin always flows into the drain in a clockwise manner is false.  But, knowledge of the Coriolis effect allows a mariner to make some rough estimates regarding the weather.  If you are facing into a steady wind, the high pressure system is on your left hand and the low pressure system is on your right hand.  Plot your course accordingly.
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Robert Blakeney
Good initial description of the Coriolis effect, Dennis. It's this same effect that is harnessed in the mass flow meters that are beginning to work their way into the marine fuel management industry. We have begun specifying and installing these meter types in various fuel measurement applications including bunkering, since they have the ability to measure the actual mass and density of the fuel and not the volume. They can be quite accurate when installed appropriately.

For those that want to learn more about Mr. Coriolis and his effect, Wikipedia has several well written articles covering the topic.
7/15/2010 12:42:50 PM
 
Jon Watson
When first introduced a great many complex and sometimes seemingly contradictory explanations were handed out to try and explain how coriolis meters worked.

I remember devising a few of my own ways to describe the effect to clients back in the 1980's-1990's. Sinuous arm waving was a particularly effective alternative to pictures of people on gramaphone records spinning round - and I had the more involved task of describing how our conventional twin bent tube variety operated differently to our new single straight tube variety!

Now the technology has become commonplace, it is enough to say "coriolis" and people are content simply to know that it works without really needing to understand how, but if you want a really convincing demonstration, you could do no worse than take a generous loop of garden hose which you hold in one hand and start the loop swinging freely. Then ask an assistant to turn the tap on and off. The results are impressive.

The only trouble I see is that good as coriolis meters unquestionably are, they have become too successful. They are like aspirin; a panacea for all metering applications.

But exceptional as they are, in some applications coriolis is not the only solution, it is not necessarily the cheapest solution and it is not necessarily the best solution.

In the marine industry and for bunkering, taking all factors into account, my meter technology choice would be Ultrasonic - as suitable for fiscal metering as coriolis mass flow meters. The only question is whether U/S meters can handle the higher viscosities we might expect in the future.

The advantage coriolis meters bring is that they have been developed to handle entrained air. The catch is that entrained air is not the same inherent component of fuel oil as it is of crude oil in a well-head meter installation.

Till now, Marine Bunkering has been an "instrument free" operation. This lack of instruments has been an open invitation to fraud and the "cappuccino effect" is one result; air has been deliberately introduced to inflate the volume - volume (dipped or metered) together with the density from the BDN equals mass delivered. Except, all that air means it isn't.

There are two approaches using instrumentation:
1) detect air and stop bunkering - or adjust the payment
2) detect air and compensate the mass measurement e.g. PD meter and EGA density meter.

Once there is no more advantage to introducing air into the fuel then that is one fraud that will go away almost overnight and with it, entrained air as a serious problem and as a justification for entrained gas metering capability.

Almost any instruments we reasonably expect to see used in fuels will detect entrained air. Visit http://viscoanalyser.com/page35a.html and you will see examples of how a digital viscometer, used as trim control in blending and at the engine for heater control, can detect and instantly reveal entrained air (and a whole lot of other problems).

Note that the BP trial in Singapore required special efforts to introduce air into the fuel for the trials. What about PD meters? Well see this article by CBI (http://www.cbi.dk/index.php and go to the articles on Singapore on the home page).

There may be many good reasons for choosing coriolis meters for bunkering, and at the engine but entrained air really doesn't hold up as a justification.

Why is Coriolis not my choice?
The answer is simple; pressure drop.
Consider the industry trends which are toward higher viscosity fuels, larger stems, higher lifts and shorter turnaround times. The enemy of all these objectives is headloss.

Coriolis meters are high pressure drop devices. The industry depends on centrifugal pumps for bunkering and flow rate is linked to pressure drop which is linked to viscosity.
If we take away entrained air as a justification and stack up U/S Vs. Coriolis, I suggest U/S will win hands down.

So now what happens when both the vessel and the barge have coriolis meters? The headlosses will increase significantly and the flow rates drop alarmingly.

What are the cures? Oversize the meters, oversize the pumps, increase the fuel storage temperature on the barge. All have a cost weight and size penalty.

On the other hand, U/S meters have no more pressure drop than the pipe they replace. Line up two or three in series and you will need to count them to know they are there.


Taken as individual stand alone applications, coriolis meters are a good solution.

But while coriolis meters may be an excellent meter technology, I'd suggest this isn't their finest application. Sooner or later, the headloss problems will become serious, when these cease to be individual standalone solutions and when a whole industry solution is considered and the industry future along with it.

So while I am Ok with coriolis as an individual solution, I would not choose coriolis meters as the industry solution, not because they are not good meters but because this is not a good application. It is a better application for PD meters and potentially an even better application for Ultrasonic meters.

I'd be very happy to hear the contrary arguments.
7/22/2010 12:36:46 PM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...