DUKW

Jan 19, 2010, 7:00AM EST
DUKW
A versatile amphibious vehicle surviving long past expectations

 The DUKW was developed at the direction of the National Defense Research Committee and the Office of Scientific Research and Development for transporting troops and light cargo during amphibious landings.  The initial contract was awarded to General Motors, which designed the prototype around its 6-wheel-drive two-and-one-half (2 ½) ton military truck.  It was basically a heavy duty truck that could also operate in water.  Although constructed out of steel, it had no armor plating.  It could, though, be equipped with a machine gun.  The DUKW had an innovative system enabling the driver to control the tire pressure from inside the cab.  With the tires fully inflated, the DUKW could travel at up to 50 mph on a road.  The tires were partially deflated for operating on softer surfaces, such as beach sand.  When afloat, the DUKW was powered by a propeller at the stern, giving it an effective speed of six knots.  The DUKW designation was assigned by General Motors: D meaning the vehicle was designed in 1942; U meaning utility; K meaning all-wheel drive; and W meaning that the two rear axles were powered.  Thousands of DUKWs were built during World War II and pressed into service by the Army, the Navy/Marine Corps, and various allied forces.  DUKWs were used in landings in the Mediterranean, in the Pacific, and on Normandy Beaches on D-Day.  After the war, many DUKWs were converted to peacetime purposes.  Numerous DUKWs were assigned to the US Coast Guard for use at lifeboat stations.  They remained in use by the Coast Guard as late as 1970.  Others were acquired by fishermen and local fire and rescue departments.  The few DUKWs still in operation are used mostly by tourist transport companies in locations adjacent to harbors, rivers, and lakes.  The US Coast Guard has recently cautioned owners of these vehicles/vessels that they require frequent inspection and maintenance due to their unique operating environment and the fact that passengers on board may be unprepared for emergencies.
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Peter Grant
I served on board JL Lauritzen's MV Thala Dan in 1979 on charter to the Australian government to re-supply their Antarctic base and they came aboard with a very similar vehicle/vessel, but powered by a Perkins engine I think, rear engined, also only one rear axle. Large mid ships deck and a small forward mounted Hi-ab style crane. Crewed by armed forces personnel.
1/20/2010 3:32:51 AM
 
Fred Hannon
We used two DUKWs in Myrtle Beach during three separate years to supply our off-shore barges directly from the beach. They wer very seaworthy & cost effective
1/21/2010 1:29:00 PM
 
Dennis Bryant
The vehicle/vessel used by the Australians in the resupply of their Antarctic base may have been a LARC - Lighter, Amphibious Resupply, Cargo. It was developed by the US Government in the 1950s and adopted for use by various foreign government agencies, including the Royal Australian Army's Corps of Transport.
1/25/2010 1:15:49 PM
 
Daryl Wilkes
I had the privilige of riding in a DUKW in the late 70's. My father was in the Army & there was one on the base in Germany. We kids used to be able to ride on it. (before Health & Safety) I dont think we would be allowed within 20 miles of it now days!
1/26/2010 4:22:45 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...