Naval Cooperation and Guidance for Shipping

Feb 23, 2010, 7:00AM EST
Naval Cooperation and Guidance for Shipping
Providing a “value added” service to the merchant marine as a means of coordinated risk reduction

 Naval control of shipping is a wartime concept, officially defined by the US Department of Defense and by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as “the control exercised by naval authorities of movement, routing, reporting, convoy organization, and tactical diversion of allied merchant shipping.”  It does not include the employment or active protection of such shipping.   This concept is largely meaningless in peacetime, when the military has almost no capability of exercising “control” over commercial shipping.  The peacetime equivalent is known as Naval Cooperation and Guidance for Shipping (NCAGS).  The US Navy, in cooperation with the US Coast Guard and the Maritime Administration (MARAD), and allied forces assist the commercial maritime sector in identifying threats and taking steps to minimize risks presented by those threats.  While the Navy is continually preparing for possible military conflicts, the major role of NCAGS these days relates to countering the Somali pirates and, more recently, coordinating commercial maritime activity involved in the Haitian earthquake relief effort.  A convoy system has been established for group transits through the Gulf of Aden.  A reporting protocol has been established for merchant vessels operating in the high-threat area of the Indian Ocean, designed to provide naval forces with a common operating picture so that military assets can be deployed most effectively.  The difference between the World War II naval control of shipping and the NCAGS concept is that in World War II, the Navy exercised actual control and issued orders, whereas NCAGS issues guidance and makes recommendations.    While adoption and implementation of the naval guidance provided to the merchant marine in the Indian Ocean area is optional, records show that ships operating independently or contrary to the recommended best management practices have a much higher risk of suffering a hijacking by Somali pirates.  
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...