Short-Sea Shipping Talk Back

Feb 04, 2010, 1:00AM EST
Short-Sea Shipping Talk Back
Here's what readers had to say about January's MarineNews feature "Navigating Obstacles: The Trials and Tribulations of Short-Sea Shipping"

One reader sees some port authorities and an unwillingness to take risks as potential obstacles to short-sea shipping:

"...today in the USA different port authorities actively look to restrict the development of inland shipping and coastal sea routes. The best comment I have heard to date while working on the MAMH [Mid-Atlantic Marine Highway] is that the single river landing we are looking to develop is in 'direct competition with the Port of N.Y./N.J.'" Really a single river landing on the upper navigational reaches of the Delaware River is a threat. What this highlights is the lack of willingness of stakeholders to allow market entry..." 

"Rather then embrace and encourage change the conservative nature of America's maritime limits the interest of private investment. Private investment encourages risk and this in turn welcomes market growth. Government involvement to a significant point and economic factor hinders risk and thus Government needs to foster involvement of private investment, letting these market forces converge and be the 'tipping point of coastal shipping.' Then and only then will the so called tipping point be breached."

Another reader pointed out that if short-sea shipping were a viable business model, there would be a market happening already. Everyone who has conducted a study on short-sea shipping agress that it must be subsidized to get off the ground:

"I certainly am one who would like to see the concept developed into a successful mode of transportation. Unfortunately, with fuel prices at their present levels and with the current reduction in truck and rail freight volumes due to the recession, it most probably will not happen anytime soon. The fact that lots of studies have been completed tends to underscore the reality that this alternative transportation mode needs a little too much tweaking to rise up and run on its own solid business principles. In short, without major changes in tax laws, fuel prices and infrastructure developments, short-sea shipping iis still off in the future..."


 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...