Reducing particulates on older engines.

Jun 16, 2010, 11:20AM EST
As emission requirements become stricter as the years pass, the question arises, what to do with older engines. The EPA Marine Engine Re manufacture Program introduces a law effective March 2008 to force operators of older ship engines to upgrade them to reduce emissions. The rules are rather limited, specifying that the improvement must reduce particulates (PM) by at least 25 per cent, that the engines concerned are commercial (not recreational) applications, manufactured after 1973, over 600kW, cylinder displacement under 30 liters and be a US flagged vessel. The upgrade only becomes compulsory if there is an EPA approved upgrade available and must be carried out at the next scheduled ‘re manufacturing event’ e.g. replacing cylinder liners. Changing many parts to effectively convert an old engine into a new model is usually not economic, nevertheless changing some parts can make a significant reduction in emissions. Although other ways to achieve the same end of reduced emissions are changing fuels, fuel additives or adopting an after treatment system.

As emission requirements become stricter as the years pass, the question arises, what to do with older engines. Although time will eventually retire these trusty old workhorses very many of them will be around for a long, long time. The EPA Marine Engine Re manufacture Program introduces a law effective March 2008 to force operators of older ship engines to upgrade them to reduce emissions. The rules are rather limited, specifying that the improvement must reduce particulates (PM) by at least 25 per cent, that the engines concerned are commercial (not recreational) applications, manufactured after 1973, over 600 kW, cylinder displacement under 30 litres and be a US flagged vessel. The upgrade only becomes compulsory if there is an EPA approved upgrade available and must be carried out at the next scheduled ‘remanufacturing event’ e.g. replacing cylinder liners. So far EMD is the only manufacturer producing such a kit. Caterpillar recently announced that they will be making kits available for some of their engines.

Marine engines are usually developed from one generation to another over many years giving the possibility that the components used to make an engine comply with modern and future emission regulations will often back fit older models of the same series. Changing many parts to effectively convert an old engine into a new model is usually not economic, nevertheless changing some parts can make a significant reduction in emissions. The parts change normally can be fitted within the engine and not require major reconfiguration of the engine room.

Although other ways to achieve the same end of reduced emissions are changing fuels or fuel additives or adopting an after treatment system: these solutions usually require changing fuel storage arrangements which is not always easy in an older vessel and can be very expensive.

Let’s hope that not only other manufacturers will join the program, but other countries will encourage fitting these improvement kits on older vessels and reduce the health hazard of PM discharge into the atmosphere.

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Clark Dodge
Aloha Keith. I have spent several years dealing with emissions and turbocharger lag, black stacking and the causes. The secret here is no one single bullet is the answer as too many variables are involved. Applications are a huge part of the big picture. Getting the people together in a brainstorming meeting can solve many things. You need the factories, designers, operators and maintenance people to name a few. The engines that are presently belching black smoke don't have to and engines such as EMD with the gear driven Turbochargers have not had this problem for years. Now we can do similar fixes for straight exhaust driven turbochargers. Hence is the fuel burns cleaner and creates less soot then the particulate matter is reduced without having to do an untimely engine change out. The options are in today’s ships or plants, the engine can be the single greatest expense of the whole ship. I have been working on ways to help here, working directly with the manufactures to help, not hinder the work they have done.
6/17/2010 4:26:45 PM
 
Keith Henderson
Thanks for your comments Clark and how right you are that no engine needs to belch black smoke. The main problems seem to be general wear, too rich on accelerating and low loading / power output. None of these are new items and discussions with the manufacturer can usually put things right.
6/25/2010 7:19:09 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

5/1/2012

Ricardo Allu
Send to pentamaq@gye.satnet.net