Experiments to curtail CO2 emissions

Jun 06, 2010, 1:12PM EST
Projects running with NYK Line ships under the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism are investigating technological developments to curtail CO2 emissions from marine vessels. In the main project, two NYK ships, are equipped with an air blower to supply air to the vessel's bottom to reduce frictional resistance. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries supplied the engines and is also participating in the experiment. It was decided that, a module carrier, would be best type of vessel for this experiment. she has a wide, shallow-draft hull minimizing the energy required by the electrically blower supplying air to the vessel's bottom and should better retain the supplied air under the vessel's bottom.


Three parallel projects are currently running with NYK Line ships under the Japanese Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism initiative to investigate technological developments to curtail CO2 emissions from marine vessels. Project 1 concerns hull friction reduction, in a twin screw shallow draft vessel using air lubrication. Project 2 looks into using larger car carriers to reduce the CO2 emissions per car carried. Project 3 is using a navigation control system to improve planning to make better use of port berth windows and canal passage reservations, thereby reducing time wastage.

In Project 1, two NYK ships, the Yamatai launched in March this year and the Yamato due in November are equipped with an air blower to supply air to the vessel's bottom to reduce frictional resistance. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries supplied the engines and is also participating in the experiment.

It was decided that, a module carrier, would be best type of vessel for this experiment. Compared to other large vessels, she has a wide, shallow-draft hull that would produce relatively lower water pressure and therefore minimize the energy required by the electrically powered blower supplying air to the vessel's bottom. Furthermore the flat, wide bottom should better retain the supplied air under the vessel's bottom and reduce loss up the sides.

There are main objectives of the experiment: verifying the fuel savings using air lubrication, investigating the air bubble type and behavior under differing sea conditions, determining the relationship between volume of air supplied and its effect and determining the actual CO2 reduction.
Progress reports on Projects 2 and 3 will be released at a later date.

 
Filed under: air, CO2, emissions, lubrication, NYK
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
John Archibald
Back in the late 1970's I did some self funded testing on a similar concept I called a Captured Air Bubble Displacement (CABD) hull.

The focus was on river barge hulls, large, flat slow, ..almost all frictional resitance. The concept was to capture air in large chambers against the bottom of the displacement hull to minimize frictional resistance. Small model and prototype concept tests with a group of like minded naval architects indicated some promise. A patent application was rejected initally by the patent office based on their interpretation of prior art, which was unclear at best and was probably meant to cover the lighter, air cushion vehicle approach.

We considered it for an ocean going bulk carrier but never got the time to pursue it as everyone moved up the corporate ladder in their other jobs.

There are issues to resolve, wavemaking resistince, optimizing air chamber size and shape for stability and wavemaking, air loss, beaching and grounding operations common to barge operations.

But my recollection was that a barge train could cut its frictional surface area and resistance by about 50-80%, using this type of hull.

I still think it holds lots of promise and could save a lot of operators a lot of fuel and reduce emissions.

Someone else will have to take it from here.
6/9/2010 10:01:18 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...