Increasing engine damage caused by catalyst fines

Apr 29, 2010, 10:47AM EST
Last month a briefing to underwriters in London covered the increasing incidence of severe engine damage. The drive towards low sulfur fuels is causing fuel refining processes to change, some of which result in below standard HFO being delivered to ships. A higher presence of particles called catalyst fines is precipitating very costly engine damage. Cat fines have always been present in bunker oils and standard ISO 8217 (2005) permits up to 80 ppm, but the problem is that more than 15 – 20 ppm already causes damage to engine parts. The components most at risk to accelerated wear are: the fuel pump, piston rings and cylinder liners. Sadly the prognosis is that with the increasing demand for low sulfur fuel, engine failures are going to increase. Until fuel standards improve a 100 per cent fuel management policy to purify the fuel is the only guarantee to avoid these problems.

Last month a briefing to a group of marine insurance underwriters in London covered the subject of deteriorating fuel quality and the increasing incidence of severe engine damage.

The drive towards low sulfur fuels is causing fuel refining processes to change, some of which result in below standard HFO being delivered to ships.

A higher presence of tiny (5 – 30 microns) but very abrasive particles called catalyst fines is precipitating very costly engine damage. Comprising aluminum and silicon oxides, they are carried over from the catalyst during the refining process and find their way into the fuel. As these particles are harder than the engine surfaces, it’s the engine that wears  - not the particles.

Cat fines have always been present in bunker oils and standard ISO 8217 (2005) permits up to 80 ppm, but the problem is that more than 15 – 20 ppm already causes damage to engine parts.

Engines suffering the most problems are medium and high speed diesels, burning low-sulfur fuels. The vessel size is, on average, less than 5,000 Dwt, is 15 plus years old and plies Europe and the Mediterranean, going in and out of SECA areas. The components most at risk to accelerated wear are: the fuel pump, piston rings and cylinder liners.

Sadly the prognosis is that with the increasing demand for low sulfur fuel, engine failures are going to increase as more catalyst fines are found in fuel. Using MDO will guarantee better fuel quality than HFO but it is 40 per cent more expensive

Until fuel standards improve the only guaranteed way to avoid these problems will be continued vigilance in adhering to a 100 per cent fuel management policy to purify the fuel on board before it goes into the engine.

 
Filed under: catalyst, damage, engine, fines, fuel, low, sulphur
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Ron Oyer
Small particles in large percentage can overwhelm "marginally sized" separators. This has occurred in the past with very large shoreside diesel generating plants using medium speed engines. All engine types are vulnerable. AlfaLaval developed a very effective sizing criteria for HFO separators however, the ship design and bidding process often overlooks this. Sharp ship and power plant operators have been spec'ing oversized separators to allow for much lower flow rates to ensure adequate separation. It is however, quite difficult to encourage the average operator to "over engineer" the separator installation. Although the separator installations of HFO plants can be a significant part of the overall plant cost they are, in essence, the "heart" of any diesel plant. Prudent separator operation is one area of floor plate engineering that cannot be over emphasized.
4/29/2010 2:10:42 PM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...