Inspection of SAR assets

Oct 30, 2009, 2:10PM EST
Condition and safety compliance of vessels intended for high endurance and rescue mission purpose.

I don't know if it is just my region, the fact that boating is so seasonal, complacency or what, but a few incidents I have recently witnessed make me wonder if we are doing our best regarding structural condition and personal safety, when it comes to our SAR assets and the men and women who put their lives at risk saving others.
Here are a couple of examples: I was hired to prepare damage report on an airboat used by a fire department. The call came in about recreational fisherman in trouble on a lake who's ice had just broken up and this airboat was dispatched. First the airboat's carburetor was freezing up and then the wind came up, in open water waves overtook the boat and it sank under the rescuers in sixty feet of water. Helicopters and a hovercraft had saved the lives of the rescuers and the fishing fools just in the nick of time, but during my research I found that the boat was not meant for deep water service and that advances in hull design and fuel injected engines have made the subject boat obsolete a long time ago. Fact is, it was never suited for waters deeper than a swamp. Then there is the case of the police department where a 55 MPH four years old 20' RIB was being "tested" by a young officer after recent repairs to the engine and the officer was thrown from the boat on a flat calm day in July. The boat, on full throttle in big circles came around again and again nearly running over the operator now in the water. Luckily, another officer in a 35 foot, brand new aluminum patrol boat had followed the RIB out on the lake just in case it needed a tow back (as it had just been repaired). There was no way to stop the RIB except by putting the aluminum patrol boat into it's path, which the driver of the patrol boat did. The RIB bounced off of the port aft quarter of the patrol boat, swung the helm about and took off doing circles now in the opposite direction, still coming very close to running over it's operator in the water. Again, the patrol boat was presented into the way of the RIB, this time catching the patrol boat on the starboard bow with such an impact that folded the bow of the FRP hull of the RIB some eight feet back, and causing heavy bow damage and irreparable longitudinal distortion to the patrol boat, nearly killing it's operator. A GPS plotter that was mounted above the RIB's throttle lever had actually ripped from the helm console and had landed on the throttle lever shutting the 275 HP outboard finally down. My inspection had revealed that there was no engine kill safety tether fitted (onboard the RIB)! Imagine that! It boggled my mind and to this day it does. The near loss of lives, the damage to the career of two officers and about $300K in damages could have been prevented so easily. The RIB's manufacturer claims they do not build to ABYC standards and that the size of the boat (they market it as a "cruiser"), does not constitute the need for an engine kill tether. Give me a break - an open boat reaching speeds in excess of 50 knots! What about the police department's in-house technician who worked on the boat? Where was he trained to let such a machine go out without an engine kill tether switch? In Canada and I know in the US as well, commercial and passenger carrying vessels are regularly and routinely inspected. Does anyone survey maritime rescue assets? I have been involved in similar cases on a post event basis with our government owned boats, such as the Ministry of Natural Resources, finding serious deficiencies. Our government "self insures". Does anyone ever inspect their boats? Is this just a Canadian problem?
 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Chandran Peechulli
I wish the valued readers to give your views on the valued subject title "Condition and safety compliance of vessels" even the Surveyors of MCA(authoritarians) blindly support the ship-owners and Ship Managers since the sailors are small fry.Where is the Law and Order to seek justice, when the enforcement officers harass the upright officers who come to them for the Certificate of Competency? Please view this right up on the subject.
Marine Pollution - subjective and national interest.
Thursday, 29 October, 2009 10:57 AM
From:"chandran chandran" <pkc484@yahoo.com>

To: secyship@nic.in, dgship@dgshipping.com, lakshmi@dgshipping.com, sbagnihotri@dgshipping.com, cs@dgshipping.com, mehrotra@dgshipping.com, na@dgshipping.com, suresh@dgshipping.com, kulkarni@insa.org.in, secygen@insa.org.in, jsports@nic.in, diriwt@nic.in
Cc: vc_imu@yahoo.in, campus.imu@tn.nic.in, tschanakya@hotmail.com, mariner@bom2.vsnl.net.in, meribom@vsnl.com, director@merical.ac.in, iipmcal@dataone.in, nsdrc@itpvis.ap.nic.in
Bcc: andreas.droussiotis@bs-shipmanagement.com, cy-sdc-man@bs-shipmanagement.com, "Rajaish Bajpaee" <bajpaee@netvigator.com>, rajaish.bajpaee@bs-shipmanagement.com, rajaish.bajpaee@eurasiagroup.com, hk-sdc-man@bs-shipmanagement.com, arvind.sharma@bs-shipmanagement.com

Unacceptable Quote: It's time to have some legislation in place whereby no State Government is allowed to prosecute and criminalise any seafarer no matter what. They should only be allowed to impose a fine on the ship/ship-owner for any fault of the ships' crew. The ship-owners can get a suitable cover from their P&I Clubs for this purpose.
- Capt. B.S. Koli, Source: http://www.shipping-news.net/user/blog_zone/blog.asp
Silence, has never been an option for concerned Citizens
Comments: All seafarers of the Merchant Navy are not the upright and disciplined lot; hence take no chances for polluting the divine sea. Some Chief- Engineers and Captains can stoop to any level to please the ship-owners and commit commercial crimes, to reduce downtime and quick turnaround of vessel at the cost of polluting the divine sea, e.g. pumping out ER bilges(leakages and drains), sludge’s turned out as waste from L.O., F.O. Purifiers, oily bilge water directly to sea, tank-cleaning waste oil of tankers presuming that it will go unnoticed, thereby pleasing their employers owing to their job-insecurity, unlike those employed on war ships, where discipline is instilled. We need therefore assurance for transparency, commitment with responsibility, the need for Senior Officers to take oath, for the general well-being. Is it not? The need therefore to block the loopholes in the system, taking no chances. Criminals should not go unpunished, or else they are encouraged to do so. One should learn to think and act fairly and efficiently, to produce high thoughts and ideals, to make up a good society to live with. Doing without thinking is of no quality or efficiency. Indian seafarers who are actively sailing out at sea, are very well aware of the IMO legislation, for the prevention of pollution by oil, as they strictly comply with it, while sailing around the oceans of the world, except on Indian waters.

Deliberate and intentional Oil Pollution caused to Indian coast, out at sea, An Indian Captain employed by Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement Co. managing a fleet of over 700 ships, takes a fully loaded VLCC with visible 2 cracks (14cm x 7.5cm & 9.5cm) dimension, on No. 1stbd COT, from were oil seeps out during sailing, 8nm off Indian west coast / 4nm off Kiltan Island, were there is heavy wx/rain, restricted visibility & heavy traffic density of Fishing/coastal vessel just for Mobile phone signal, there by polluting Indian Coast and Marine environment. If we have some legislation in place whereby no State Government is allowed to prosecute and criminalize any seafarer, no matter what, as suggested by Capt. B.S. Koli. Hence, Indian coast will be turning into a world dumping ground, as it is gaining publicity. We should therefore have strict legislation in place like US or European countries, which will prevent seafarers/ Shipping companies from polluting and damaging the marine environment.

"Those who have the privilege to know, have the duty to act."…Albert Einstein

"It's hard to calculate the damages happened and happening to our country.
An eye-opener to the International Maritime Regulating and Governing Authority, relevant associated authorities more particularly
the relevant national maritime authority, calling for efforts to keep the world shipping trade alive. ……..
Arun Chandran.
View: editorial contents in < www.themarinewaves.com > Oil Pollution Photos & clips in highlights.

Dr. Chandran Peechulli, Ph.D; MBA; D.Sc; FIE(India), PgDIMS(UK), PgTED; FIIPE; MSEI; MSNAME(USA), Ex.Chief Engineer(Marine), G.M.(Tech) Crossworld Shipping. Managing Editor & Publisher - "MARINE WAVES" International Maritime Newsletter. www.themarinewaves.com
11/1/2009 12:03:50 AM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

5/1/2012

Ricardo Allu
Send to pentamaq@gye.satnet.net

Post archive

October 2009(1)