Reliable container shipping? Who would have thought ...

Sep 20, 2011, 9:27PM EST
The world's biggest container carrier steps out of the box and prepares to usher in a new fixed and guaranteed daily service.

Maersk Line boss Eivind Kolding rolled into Hong Kong on Monday for the Asian launch of the carrier’s new Daily Maersk service that will start officially on October 24.

The service offers customers fixed daily cut offs between the Asian ports of Yantian, Shanghai, Ningbo and Tanjung Pelepas and the North Europe ports of Felixstowe, Rotterdam and Bremerhaven.

The promised reliability and guaranteed delivery times is unprecedented in the business, as is a pledge by Maersk to offer US$100 per container if the box is one to three days late, and US$300 per container if it is four or more days late.

At first glance this appears to be a bold move by the Danish carrier, but there really is little risk involved. The sheer size of Maersk Line means 65,000 TEUs of capacity a week will be available for the Daily Maersk service, with 70 ships deployed on the Asia-North Europe trade.

The vessels will be between 8,000 and 15,000 TEUs and when the 18,000 TEU triple-E class container ships start floating into service from 2013, they will also slot into the Asia-Europe trade and the Daily Maersk service.

Maersk makes much of the fixed and guaranteed transportation time as opposed to transit time. The new service promises cargo will be delivered on time, and Maersk said shippers will no longer have to include buffer time in their shipments.

However, the 34-day total transportation time from Shanghai to Rotterdam is essentially the old 28-32-day voyage with additional buffer days built in. Where it differs is that Maersk is prepared to offer the guarantee, something hard to find among other carriers.

It is here that the size of the Maersk operation and network takes the risk out of the equation. It can offer fixed daily sailings from the four ports in Asia and three in Europe participating in the Daily Maersk service (the ships will also call at other ports in Asia and Europe) because it has 70 vessels deployed on the trade.

If a shipper misses one sailing he will have the option of sending his cargo on the following day instead of having to wait a week.

Kolding said there would be no surcharge for the service and freight rates would be negotiated with customers. But he pointed out that the value would come from the cost savings to the line’s customers, and “we would hope to be able to negotiate a better rate”.

It will be interesting to see how the market reacts to the Daily Maersk service and whether other carriers either introduce such a service, or use vessel-sharing agreements to set up something similar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Gary Ferrulli
You are missing a key component of this which many shippers in Asia will not; namely the "bring your freight in any day, 7 days a week." Cut offs require extra planning, even a day or two longer at the manufacturers or the consolidation point. Not with Maersk. This will over time be a significant component of the planning process of shippers and consignees.
Also please note that the number one priority of "shippers" is reliability - every marketing study done since the 1980's has said that. Reliability - do what you say you are going to do.
Transit time from door to door was also in the top five of requirements, but reliability was number one.
9/22/2011 11:43:39 AM
 
Greg Knowler
The service has not yet started so it is too early to be a cheerleader. Whether the reliability Maersk promises can be achieved remains to be seen, but by offering guarantees and payment for late delivery, I have no doubt the small print exclusion clauses will cover many pages.
9/22/2011 9:39:56 PM
 

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

5/1/2012

Ricardo Allu
Send to pentamaq@gye.satnet.net