Too much tonnage, recession or no recession

Oct 07, 2009, 10:09PM EST
The container shipping industry was headed for overcapacity even without a slowdown in trade.

When Maersk chief financial officer Morten Nicolaisen was asked at a New Jersey conference this week how on earth the lines could have found themselves in such a catastrophic overcapacity situation, all he could come up with was a verbal shrug.

“The collective behaviour of carriers adding more ships is what has led to this situation we are in today,” he told his audience.

It wasn’t much of an answer, and when pressed, he said: “Everyone was looking at upward curves and it was more ships, bigger ships with very little thought of what it would do to the industry when the supply and demand gap began widening.”

That staggering lack of foresight has left the container shipping industry with more than 10 percent of its capacity lying idle and laid up. The waters around Singapore look like the places ships go to die, rather than the world’s busiest maritime trade lane.

But the truth is that container shipping executives blindly followed each other, desperately afraid of losing market share. In the financial market, when everyone is screaming “buy, buy, buy”, it is a brave man who yells “sell”. With most of the major carriers placing orders in the last few years, it would have taken a bold CEO to face down his board and argue against adding capacity.

Perhaps the business is simply geared towards boom and bust cycles. Times are good – order ships and hike freight rates. Times are bad – live with low capacity and weak rates.

At the same conference, an economist pointed out that in the past five years, the carriers fleet has grown by 60 percent, so even if the recession had not happened the industry would still have ended up with overcapacity.

In the real world, so much excess tonnage would result in shipping lines going under, but even if lines aren’t state owned, national pride still keeps them afloat. Just look at Hapag-Lloyd that was bailed out by a German consortium.

That the industry will have to transform is obvious, but how will it change? The Maersk CFO remained in noncommittal mode. “Clearly, the industry has to change or transform, and this will take different twists and turns depending on whether the carrier is government-run, or has private investors,” he said.

 

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

5/16/2012

Colin Henthorne
Thanks for your response, Dennis. You are correct that the...

5/16/2012

Dennis Bryant
From its commissioning until 1957, the LABRADOR was a ship ...

5/15/2012

Colin Henthorne
LABRADOR was decommissioned in 1962. In 1987, as a Coast G...

5/11/2012

CAPT SANDEEP KALIA
Dear Editor, Compliments for a very well written article...

5/7/2012

Murray Goldberg
Hey John - I think you tried to give me your e-mail address...

5/7/2012

John Douglas
email address

5/2/2012

Martin Rushmere
I must add a clarification to this. I am referring to the a...

5/1/2012

Dennis Bryant
John, You are swimming against the tide. Dennis

5/1/2012

Murray Goldberg
John - thank you so much! Incredibly we are approaching 130...

5/1/2012

Ricardo Allu
Send to pentamaq@gye.satnet.net