Beijing busy securing its bulk supply chain

Mar 25, 2010, 10:39PM EST
China is on a bulk-building spree in a bold bid to take the extreme volatility out of the market.

Chinese steel giant Baoshan Iron & Steel Co (Baosteel) this week announced the launching of its first very large ore carrier.

The 230,000 dwt Renda slid out of CSSC Guangzhou Longxue Shipbuilding, a new yard in Guangdong’s provincial capital. It will be commissioned in May, according to mainland reports.

The ship belongs to Haibao Shipping, a joint venture between Baosteel Resources and China Shipping Development. It is the first of four 230,000 dwt and two 300,000 dwt bulkers.

They don’t call the ships “very large ore carriers” for nothing and with a draft of over 20m, the vessels will more than likely operate on shuttle runs from deepwater ore exporting ports in Brazil and Australia to China. Most of the iron ore is offloaded in China’s northern ports of Qingdao, Rizhao, Tianjin and Lianyungang.

Baosteel is building these large carriers so it can control its own supply chain. For the huge mainland raw material suppliers, and for Beijing, having mainland vessels on hand to transport the grist for its economic mill is crucial for the stabilizing of prices and the guarantee of space amid a volatile market.

This was borne out by a recent HIS Fairplay report in which senior consultant Niklas Bengtsson said contracts for the building of 143 million dwt would be signed by 2013. This, he said, was the effect of China wanting to transport its cargo on its own vessels and raw material suppliers securing tonnage for deliveries.

For China, securing its own transportation will enable Beijing to focus its energy on bringing down the prices of raw materials such as iron ore. Global ore suppliers are asking for an 80-90 percent increase in benchmark prices.

China has a bulk orderbook of 3,783 ships, with 33 orders being placed in January, according to Bengtsson. That’s a lot of ships, but if the mainland’s state-owner carriers aren’t subjected to the same supply-demand volatility as the rest of the market it may be a good move.

 

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...