Forget boxes – it was bulkers that enabled globalization

Feb 16, 2010, 9:15PM EST
The fires of globalization are stoked by raw materials, not Hello Kitty bags, Barbie dolls and die-cast Ferraris.

A study by Dutch research outfit Dynamar makes an interesting point. Container shipping companies are generally credited with carrying the goods that enabled the trading network to span the globe.

Yet even though the products the box boats carry are made, assembled or finished in China and the other export-based economies of Asia, the materials used in their production are dug from the ground all around the world.

Iron ore and coking coal from Brazil, Australia, India and the US. Crude oil from Venezuela, Indonesia and the Middle East. Cotton from India, the US and Pakistan. A host of raw materials from Africa.

Without the breakbulk operators, the container ships would have nothing to stuff in their equivalent units.

Container ships with their neat boxes stacked high sailing into port cities have always been the clean face of shipping. The Brad Pitts of the business (although with the surcharge shenanigans and the overcapacity mess they are probably better described right now as the Tiger Woods of the industry).

But the point is that the bulkers and tankers have been quietly getting on with the job of providing fuel for the globalization fire. China’s unquenchable thirst for raw materials improved the bottom lines of many bulk operators and charter rates went through the roof before the financial crisis.

The GFC, as the Aussies call it (Global Financial Crisis), put the brakes on the bulk business last year making it one to forget, but utilization is picking up and charter prices are again moving in the right direction.

Unlike the container business that newbuilt itself to a standstill, bulk shippers took a more conservative approach, and the result is that much of the fleet is over 25 years old. According to Dynamar, the bulk ship orderbook is currently at 25 percent of the global fleet. But if the ships older than 25 years were scrapped today, the orderbook would only replace 70 percent of the lost space.

That is not such a bad position to be in. China is signing gigantic contracts with raw material suppliers, and this will help keep bulkers full for the inbound leg. The country also exports materials such as bauxite, coke, fluorspar, silicon carbide and zinc, although quotas on the exports are limiting volumes.

But trade issues aside, globalization has created fierce competition for access to commodities and with most of the world’s manufacturing being done in Asia, breakbulk shipping lines are going to be in for a rosy few years.

 

 

 
Report abuse



Bookmark this page to:Add to Faves Add to MyAOL Add to Simpy Add to Delicious Add to Live Add to Digg Add to Newsvine Add to Reddit Add to Multiply Add to Blogmarks Add to Yahoo MyWeb Add to Slashdot Add to Mister Wong Add to Spurl Add to Furl Add to Link-a-Gogo Add to Yahoo Bookmarks Add to Twitter Add to Facebook Add to Diigo Add to Mixx Add to Segnalo Add to StumbleUpon Add to Magnolia Add to Ask Add to Backflip Add to Terchnorati Add to Google Bookmarks Add to MySpace

Comments
Blog post currently doesn't have any comments.

Sign in

Latest blog comments

2/4/2012

dilipan thomas
well there is no job for most people who has finished studi...

2/2/2012

Saunders Jones
Joe, You are right on regarding both GMATS and the Super...

1/25/2012

Joseph Keefe
Mark: You get the prize, indeed. Thanks for weighing in....

1/24/2012

Mark Sales
An apt and appropriate view of the situation. It also shou...

1/24/2012

Eric Goldring
I just wrote an article on my blog about the hype which has...

1/20/2012

Shiran Senanayake
I believe that Cruise Masters are fatigued with so many por...

1/19/2012

Alan Loynd
Absolutely correct. With the largest passenger ships now...

1/19/2012

James Lynch
Well stated. The need for regulation is obvious in any fie...

1/19/2012

Eugene (Gene) Horton
Dear Greg, I read your article on “size matters” and found...

1/19/2012

Laurie Thomas
Joe, to add to John's comment, here's another gem/bad news ...